8 Best Bitcoin Mining Software 2020 (Mac, Windows, Linux)

down the Node-Red rabbit hole, part 5 - hold my beer

part1 part2 part3 part4
so, it's been 4 months since i started this journey and i gotta say that NR has really re-vitalized my personal interest in home-automation, as well as, my HA and whole house setup.
i've done more in the past 4 months, to streamline my setup and adding new automations than i've done in the three years since i started using HA somewhere around v0.24.x'ish. i got that shit dialed in now.
(also some credit to EspHome for being awesome, despite having meh documentation. yeah, i said it. meh👏doc👏u👏men👏ta👏shun)
at this point i have about 36 NR tabs. some are just testing, or playing around with a particular component/palette, but most have at least one flow on it that is live and in use.
so, i thought i'd break some of them down for you guys, 'barney style+':
(also, some of these are way to huge to post readable screenshots of, so i'm just gonna describe them. plus some of these i detailed in my previous posts.)
first up is my globals. where i set global.vars
arrive/away
morning/bedtime/naptime
alarm
sonos
ping
watchdog
battery (the nodes are very similar to above)
switch control
harmony
remote
long term away
spotify
washedryer
doorbell
disk space
gmail
calendar
alexa TTS (subflow)
drafthouse
twitter link
so, yeah. i'd like to see some of you post some of your flows/ideas if only so i could totally steal them.
.
.
+obscure skippy joke. it's from a book++.
++yes i read. well, i audiobook, but same diff+++.
+++i mean, it's just basic science!++++
++++i mean, that study coulda been bullshit, sponsored by "the audiobook council" or some shit, but i'm taking it at face value.
submitted by stoneobscurity to homeassistant [link] [comments]

The /r/btc China Dispatch: Episode 9 - F2Pool Becomes the First Chinese Mining Pool to Support Classic… Sort Of

Hello there, /btc, and welcome to another edition of the China Dispatch.
It seems there is hardly a dull moment in Bitcoin-land these days as the Core Team’s now infamous Hong Kong consensus meeting has left not only many smaller Chinese miners expressing dissatisfaction with the approach of Adam Beck, et al., larger pools are now also breaking rank, with F2Pool announcing an unconventional approach to give their miners a voice in - to borrow a phrase from Brian Armstrong - the great Bitcoin “election” of 2016. As previously posted here, F2Pool recently announced on the 8btc forums that they have established an address for miners who wish to include the version number for Bitcoin Classic in their blocks, without actually running a Classic node in the process so as not to “violate the consensus.”
What follows is the original thread containing the announcement, translated from Chinese to English.
Note that this announcement has stirred up a lot of interesting commentary within the Chinese bitcoin community, including an interesting post on Bikeji entitled “Calling on F2Pool to Immediately Stop Using Core Nodes to Broadcast Blocks with Classic Version Numbers!” I plan to have this post as well as additional related content translated and posted by tomorrow around this same time.
[OP]
Submitted by ralsax (First Mate)
Subject: Are there no Classic pools in China?
I recently saw that there are a couple of pools outside of China. Have any of the big players in China managed to get a Classic pool up and running? Right now those who have hash power have no voting rights while pool operators without any hash power of their own are holding meetings. It seems to me that some people who control hashing power are being used as pawns without so much as an opportunity to choose for themselves.
[Reply #1]
Submitted by macbook-air (Deckhand)
F2Pool Classic Testing: stratum+tcp://stratum.f2xtpool.com:3333
[Reply #2]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
@macbook-air
It looks like you’re using a new account. Could you please go to bitcointalk and post within the F2Pool thread to confirm that you’re the leader of F2Pool?
[Reply #3]
Submitted by macbook-air (Deckhand)
@kcb
[In English:] Believe it, or Not
[Reply #4]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
@macbook-air
I hope that you’re the actual leader of the pool, since that would make me very happy personally.
I just want to carefully vet this information before I announce it elsewhere, since I can’t find any other information regarding your testing on any of the other forums.
You don’t need to use a snarky line like “believe it or not.” Your words and actions represent F2Pool.
[Reply #5]
Submitted by macbook-air (Deckhand)
@kcb
[In English:] Believe it or not is the name of a museum. http://www.ripleys.com/ [Translator’s note: it seems that macbook-air was not trying to be snarky, in the “you can believe it or not, I don’t care” sense, but more irreverent in the “believe it or not, we’re doing this awesome thing” sense.]
[Reply #6]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
@macbook-air
Peoplma on Reddit was able to confirm your information via the F2Pool dashboard.
Thanks to Shenyu for providing miners with the freedom to make their own choices.
[*Reply #7]
Submitted by Ma_Ya (Captain)
This is only a test rather than official support.
Look at the domain name: f2xtpool.com
F2Pool’s domain name is http://f2pool.com.
That is to say they’re drawing a parallel between Classic and XT and we all know what happened to XT.
It’s also important to note that they’re actually running version 0.12.0 of Core, while writing in the Classic version number for version voting purposes. That is, fundamentally this is only a voting mechanism rather than real support.
I imagine that when Classic votes begin to approach 75%, F2Pool will probably no longer continue their strategy of running Core just as a means of voting for classic blocks, in order to avoid falsely activating the hard fork.
F2Pool has already pledged that they will not run Classic, and in fact they continue to make good on that promise, but they never promised that they wouldn’t vote for Classic.
In general you run Core to vote for Core and you run Classic to vote for Classic.
On the other hand, F2Pool is running Core while voting for Classic. F2Pool really is clever. There’s a reason that they are the biggest pool in terms of hashpower without having any hashpower of their own.
[Reply #8]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
Maybe Chinese people are too used to “being represented.”
Why is it that everything has to be decided by someone else, by letting others represent you at some meeting and then decide your consensus?
Smaller Chinese miners need to unite and demand that some of the large pools provide Classic ports so that users are free to choose and can vote with their feet.
Otherwise pools are doing nothing more than treating smaller miners’ hashpower as their own, and once a Classic pool becomes available they will be abandoned by their users.
Do the pool owners really think they are some kind of People’s Congress? Just because you signed a consensus statement doesn’t mean that all your pool’s users would have been willing to sign.
[Reply #9]
Submitted by DogeCoin-Keeper (Pirate King)
@kcb
That’s just the way it is. Chinese people are just like that at the genetic level. Actually I think that the BTC system and our current financial system are basically the same: in both cases you have a minority of people representing the majority and the minority decide the direction of the majority based on their own interests. I’m quickly losing faith in this kind of system.
[Reply #10]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
@DogeCoin-Keeper
I actually feel exactly the opposite. I am committed to Bitcoin exactly because I have seen how it is capable of disrupting the current system whereby the few decide the fate of the many.
I am also Chinese and it was only after being exposed to Bitcoin that I began to slowly change and understand that there is nobody out there who will look after your own interests - in all things you have to make decisions and take action for yourself.
Pools are slowly starting to provide miners with the option of freely choosing which version to mine on.
We are already entering an era where miners make judgements on their own, vote based on their own hashpower and decide the fate of the industry into which they have personally invested.
[Reply #11]
Submitted by DogeCoin-Keeper (Pirate King)
@kcb
Just look how these developers act and then look at how capricious the pools are. It’s totally ridiculous and no different than the CCP’s Development and Reform Commission.
What use is it to have the miners vote? It’s useless if the users don’t buy their coins.
[Reply #12]
Submitted by kcb (Deckhand)
@DogeCoin-Keeper
Obviously miners will have to determine for themselves what version they should mine in order to have the most buyers of their coins. Everything will be fine as long as at least 51% of the miners are not stupid.
[Reply #13]
Submitted by ALL-IN (First Mate)
If the pools don’t give the miners a say or a choice then four years down the line they will pay for their shortsightedness.
[Reply #14]
Submitted by ralsax
This is an opportunity for new pools and smaller pools. Those who react adeptly will gain market share.
submitted by KoKansei to btc [link] [comments]

Quality of Game for mac is horrendous:

Im drinking. vodka and orange juice, hi pasha drink some live longer. This game for mac on a macbook air 4 gigs of ram is not for competitive anymore, it was, where there hasn't been much updates, where I am running many background applications like twitch streaming, bitcoin miner, where I know for a fact the condition of the game has gone down significantly pre 2015 when I started. I just saw one dude with an expensive graphics card hop over a chicken and as I get drunker, I could only wish to have such a bright daylight where my game lags, even without touching the keyboard where I suppose a peripheral uses less resources than having to use a mouse where I think the game for macbook air lost its ground since november 27 2016 glove update. I don't want to blame the glove update, but using the controller feels like its getting worse, maybe because I started streaming and I care less about performance where I just want to play the game, I wish valve would make dreams come true and fix the game for mac. I think that only a 20 percent boost where hrtf doesnt miss bandwidth or unheard shots steps or plants, or sprays where my game assumes it has 59 fps high, where while playing it is way below 21 fps where I feel that its probably gonna get worse with the next update. I wish valve could make this game playable and faster with less resources, where I would feel that with a controller I have a good game, right now after playing 9 rounds of cobble, I surrendered my team because they were losing, on top of not winning 1 single round at silver 1 the quality of the game using more than enough minimum requirements made me turn off my twitch stream, the game and steam altogether, Just for that two or three seconds of missing sounds, fps delay, full spray that half of the shots are unheard plus the fps delay where I think as a major threat valve could deliver the best csgo, so that I could play the best csgo.
submitted by TerrorDestroyer to GlobalOffensive [link] [comments]

MMW: Tech Landscape 2017

Bill Gates says that people overestimate what will happen in 5 years, but underestimate what will happen in 10. However, since I run an app business, I really need to estimate what will happen in 1 year. Here are my tech predictions, biased towards my space:
submitted by philipkd to MarkMyWords [link] [comments]

Why am I not mining?

I set up MacMiner to mine dogecoin on my macbook air's CPU (yes I know its bad for my computer but I have free electricity and I want some doge), but for some reason, it seems like I'm not actually mining.
Now, I have used my processor to mine for bitcoin in the past, and as little as it did get me, it did work. Now, I'm looking for some help on mining dogecoin.
In the dock, the icon shows that I'm getting ~900Kh, I'm not sure if thats realistic or what, but when in the updating log file, it says I'm getting 0 Kh/s.
Here is the log file
atum from pool 0 requested work update 5s: 1.23 avg: 0.62 u: 0.00 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:720.0 avg:584.4 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:419.9 avg:550.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:244.9 avg:520.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 15:59:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 15:59:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s:447.0 avg:531.4 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s: 1.11 avg: 0.61 u: 0.00 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:646.9 avg:579.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:376.8 avg:553.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:219.1 avg:529.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 15:59:53] Testing pool http://176.31.208.222:9332 [2014-01-29 15:59:53] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 15:59:53] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 15:59:53] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 15:59:54] Stratum connect failed to pool 2: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 15:59:53] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s: 1.38 avg: 0.62 u: 0.00 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s: 1.10 avg: 0.63 u: 0.00 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:896.2 avg:624.1 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:814.6 avg:626.0 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:768.3 avg:628.0 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:738.4 avg:629.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:00:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 16:00:24] Testing pool http://176.31.208.222:9332 [2014-01-29 16:00:24] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 16:00:24] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 16:00:24] Stratum connect failed to pool 2: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 16:00:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s:669.3 avg:627.9 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:664.2 avg:628.7 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:649.5 avg:628.6 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:631.5 avg:627.9 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:658.4 avg:629.7 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:633.6 avg:628.9 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:00:52] New block: ...e68b4917 #283096 diff 2.19G (15.70Ph/s) [2014-01-29 16:00:52] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2014-01-29 16:00:54] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 16:00:52] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2014-01-29 16:00:54] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s:587.1 avg:626.0 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:477.3 avg:618.4 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:415.6 avg:611.6 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:378.2 avg:605.0 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:352.7 avg:598.5 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:01:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 16:01:23] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s:962.8 avg:629.7 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:01:24] Testing pool http://176.31.208.222:9332 [2014-01-29 16:01:24] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 16:01:24] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused [2014-01-29 16:01:24] Stratum connect failed to pool 2: Failed connect to 176.31.208.222:9332; Connection refused 5s:711.7 avg:623.2 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:01:33] New block: ...23a8e95a #283097 diff 2.19G (15.70Ph/s) [2014-01-29 16:01:33] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2014-01-29 16:01:33] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block 5s:731.1 avg:626.4 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-01-29 16:01:35] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update [2014-01-29 16:01:35] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update 5s:679.3 avg:625.8 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 5s:543.3 avg:620.1 u: 0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none 
Please help a fellow shibe out!
submitted by yoseir2 to dogemining [link] [comments]

Mining crypto-currencies with a Mac easily BtcMines Club  New Bitcoin Miner  Review BITCOIN MINER NEW VERSION 2019 free bitcoin mining How to Mine Bitcoin on Mac with Honeyminer - YouTube Cryptocurrency Mining Software Tutorial Series 9 - Futurebit Moonlander 2 on macOS High Sierra

How to Mine Litecoin (LTC) on Macbook Air CPU Console Mining OSX India. Videos 0. ADS. How to Mine LiteCoin (LTC) on a CPU (MacOS) in India In this video, I’ll show you the method of mining litecoin (LTC) on a Mac OS. For windows/linux machine, … source YouTube. bitcoin; bitcoin cash; bitcoin mining; Bitcoin News; bitcoin price; camera phone; coindesk; coindesk jobs; free; litecoin ... Bitcoin Miner. It is the most popular bitcoin mining software you can choose for using on Windows 10 and Windows 8.1. This software has easy user-interface for the comfort of miners, and it also has the power-saving mode. You can even know whether mining is beneficial or not. There are also many other excellent features of this software, such as quick share submission and mining pool support ... Step 7. Click Start. In the FPGA/ASIC Miner window (in Step 5 above). Step 8. Watch the Bitcoin roll in. To monitor your progress, log into your mining pool account and watch the "My Account" page. What Is Bitcoin – A Simple Explanation How Much can you make from building and mining 6 GPU rig with Ethereum and NiceHash Bitcoin For Beginners – Learn How To Mine Bitcoin ! – Part 1 Bitcoin’s First Lightning Payment Successful How To Mine Bitcoin on MacBook , Mac os , Mac, MacBook Air / Pro ? How To Mine Bitcoin Without GPU ? Don’t even think about doing that. The MacBook Air has an ultra low voltage processor and integrated graphics. That wasn’t enough for mining bitcoins back when it was viable on personal computers, and certainly isn’t going to be enough today when ...

[index] [25840] [548] [39492] [3904] [28310] [11428] [46662] [25414] [27349] [50857]

Mining crypto-currencies with a Mac easily

Air-miner.com Bitcoin Mining Sites Without Investment 2020 Legit And Scam Live Withdraw Payment # Air-miner.com #freebtc #freemining Joining..... https://bit... This video is all about making money out of thin air. I'll be setting up mining apps on Mac, Windows, with a MacBook, a desktop, and using a graphics card, showing you how much you can earn and ... Sign up here: https://honeyminer.com/referred/5adm5 In this video we show you how to mine bitcoin on a Mac. This process is using a just released app called ... Cpu Mining : https://goo.gl/p8x614 The Btc Mines Club is a unique bitcoin Miner game where you feed little miners apples As long as you feed them, they mine bitcoin for you. There are 3 levels of ... Website Here : https://bit.ly/2Md0mUK Free Bitcoin Mining Tags: free bitcoin,new free bitcoin cloud mining site 2019,new free bitcoin cloud mining site,free bitcoin cloud mining site,free bitcoin ...

#